Building One Global

Sales Team at SIP LLC


Company Background

SIP LLC is a B2B Manufacturing company providing air compressors and parts. The company operates in North America, EMEA, LATAM and Asia with a global sales force of 12 regional managers.

Over the past two years, SIP LLC wanted to expanded rapidly through new partners in Europe, LATAM, EMEA and Asia. While revenue grew, leadership noticed serious challenges across the global sales organization.

The Challenge

Despite strong individual performance in regions, the global sales team was underperforming as a whole. Key issues included:

  • Poor sales leadership

  • Underperforming partners who lacked trust in the corporate and sales leadership

  • Siloed regional teams

  • Each region ran sales independently, with little collaboration or knowledge sharing

  • Cultural misunderstandings

    • Domestic USA sales targets were much higher than other global territories

    • EMEA teams prioritized long-term relationships and compliance

    • LATAM sales managers were hampered by exchange rate challenges and macroeconomic issues

    • APAC teams avoided direct confrontation, leading to misalignment in pipeline reviews

Marketing Challenges

  • Inconsistent sales messaging across all regions with different webpages for each region

  • Different regions positioned the product differently, confusing global clients

  • Low trust across regions

Teams blamed other regions for missed global deals and poor handoffs.

Global win rates stalled at 12%, and employee engagement surveys showed declining morale.

The Objective

AKA My 3 goals

1. Build trust and team cohesion across regions

2. Improve cross-regional collaboration on global deals

3. Create a shared sales identity and language via a unified corporate website and branding

The Team-Building Exercise: “Global Deal Challenge”


Overview

SIP LLC designed a 2-day virtual team-building and sales simulation involving sales reps from all regions.

Participants were mixed into cross-regional teams (North America, EMEA, LATAM, APAC represented in each group).

Exercise Structure

Phase 1: Cross-cultural Business Exchange and Trust Building

Activity: “How We Sell” Roundtable

Each participant shared:

  • What are the best practices for their territory

  • How deals are typically won in their region

  • One cultural norm that affects negotiations

  • One frustration working with other regions

  • Rules:

    • No defending or interrupting

    • Clarifying questions only

OUTCOME: Sales reps realized many “problems” were cultural differences, not lack of effort.

Phase 2: The Global Deal Simulation

Activity: “Save the Account”

Each team received a complex fictional global account:

  • Headquarters in the U.S.

  • Decision-makers in Germany and Japan

  • Regulatory and pricing constraints in multiple regions

Teams had to:

  • Align on a single value proposition

  • Decide who leads each conversation

  • Plan handoffs between regions

  • Agree on negotiation tactics

Constraint:

  • No region could “win” alone—success required collaboration.

Phase 3: Reflection and Feedback

Activity: Structured Debrief

Teams discussed:

  • Where communication broke down

  • Which cultural assumptions caused friction

  • What improved decision-making

    Leaders observed but did not intervene.

Tools Used:

  • Shared virtual whiteboards

  • Time-zone rotation to ensure fairness

Each team received a complex fictional global account:

  • Headquarters in the U.S.

  • Decision-makers in Germany and Japan

  • Regulatory and pricing constraints in multiple regions

Results

Within 6 months:

  • Global win rate increased from 12% to 31%

  • Deal cycle time decreased by 19%

  • Cross-region deal participation increased by 40%

  • Employee engagement scores rose, especially in “feeling heard”

Sales teams reported:

  • More empathy for regional differences

  • Clearer ownership on global deals

  • Stronger informal relationships across borders

Key Learnings

1.

Cultural differences are assets, not obstacles. When acknowledged openly, they improve strategy.

2.

Shared experiences build trust faster than training slides. Simulations created safe failure and learning.

3.

Global sales need common branding, website, language, not uniform behavior. Alignment matters more than identical processes.

Workshop Discussion Questions

1. Where do silos exist in your current sales organization?

2. How do cultural norms influence negotiation and decision-making?

3. What would a “Global Deal Challenge” look like in your company?

4. How can leaders reinforce these behaviors post-exercise?

Previous
Previous

A 3,000 Person Presentation on Product Sustainability in the Philippines…No Sweat!

Next
Next

Hurricane Otis: People-Centered Leadership Saved Us in Acapulco